A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo
✓Claimant Diana Licet Isaza Farfan Y Otra
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se confirma en su integridad el auto recurrido
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el auto que rechazó la demanda de la referencia, en virtud de no haber sido corregida en los términos señalados en la providencia de inadmisión.
Tras considerar que del recurso de súplica no se extrae cuál es el yerro, olvido o arbitrariedad en el que incurrió el auto que se cuestiona, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decide CONFIRMARLO.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- RESUELVE:
- UNICO.- CONFIRMAR el Auto del 25 de mayo de 2016, dictado por el Magistrado Sustanciador Luis Guillermo Guerrero Perez, por medio del cual se rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra el articulo 28 (parcial) de la Ley 70 de 1931, identificada con el numero de radicacion D-11378, presentada por las ciudadanas Diana Licet Isaza Farfan y Yeritze Nataly Ardila Urbina.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.